Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Jockey Suggestion.

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Jockey Suggestion.

    Listen I know I am new, and I know this idea won't be popular, but, I am going to suggest it anyway. Based on this little fact....

    We are fast approaching the halfway point of season 32. Two jockeys (Ortiz and Velazquez) are absolutely dominating three racetracks, Belmont, Calder and Santa Anita.

    Meanwhile, 24 jockeys have less than 30 races. And a few have zero.

    For the sake of realism, maybe each racetrack should have a completely separate jockey pool?


  • #2
    I agree with you in principle here. I've played with ideas like this in the past but not sure how much programming would be invovled to restrict jocks to certain tracks Even if so it would get even more tricky with the Bel mont races in the evening that are ran on the Cal track to avoid bias. I would even go so far as to say horses should have to choose a career track with the lesser horses going to Cal and the better ones going to Bel. Then maybe a small fee to change between Cal and Bel but I get carreid away with stuff like that. But you do make a valid point I just dont know if they would be willing to put the programming or the time into it. You may accmoplish more with a push just to get other players to experiment with other jocks more. There are several that are godo that dont get used I'm sure. I have a list of about 16 that produce decent times in works so I always have someone I'm okay with using in a pinch.
    ** at 21:06, Brian joined the Lobby...
    Brian Ta Das...

    https://www.facebook.com/digitaldowns.us
    https://twitter.com/Digitaldowns_US

    Comment

    Working...
    X